|
Blue Forest http://www.lslnet.com at 2:08 p.m. on August 16, 2006
|
|
And the interrupted signals
|
|
When the signal can be done with true asynchronous operation of a particular function, whether the signal is interrupted in the form of the operation?
Linux users in the vector space is not provided with a suspension of the functions (if there is any function), and similar disruption to the operation of this form can only signal the way?
1/18.2 dos each have one clock pulse, every clock pulse operation of a clock interrupt service routine, but Linux is jiffies dispersion as a unit that it and the minimal time for the dispersion of film, which is not real-time performance in Linux is not as DOS?
Whether the suspension of the Linux kernel programming only in the concept only, and no interruption in userspace this concept?
Thank you Fan hard
|
|
|
Re : the signal interruption
|
|
If they want to use the real hardware failure, the device driver must be prepared. If we feel that the accuracy of the timer LINUX enough, but the hardware you have more precision clock! However, high precision clock, too frequently interrupted, the system will lead to cost too much. The best, by sampling a complete hardware and then made to the mainframe suspended use the batch method. Suggested reading "The chapter on the timer and interrupt. Also : 1/18.2=0.055s=55ms!!
|
|
|
Re : the signal interruption
|
|
Signal interruption and not a concept. Signal system is in the process of scheduling a marker in the process of accession to the table only.
|
|