Linux -Blue forest free software | Return to home page | Site Map | Search WWW | Contact Us |
Your current position : Homepage > Free Software > Technological exchanges >Network Communication


    

Blue Forest http://www.lslnet.com at 13:28 on July 26, 2006

Static Routing on the issue


Published in 2004-11-10 15:11 : static routing problems on the theme :

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

One of the aims of the same network, there are two paths to reach, and made a path for the two static routing.

If one link off the (interface down), the bad link in the routing table of this will disappear automatically?

If that link is constantly Line Agreement (interface up, line protocl down), which seems to be worse on the link will not go away.

There is no good solution is not to adopt dynamic routing?

I think if static routing the routing table information is not going to disappear, the happiest if RIP or IGRP will certainly disappear if the lines are bad, you can do some configuration, such ROUTER1 ROUTER2 two routes, the purpose of the network is A, you can ticket R1-R2-A, mediated, R2-R1-A, R2-A also equivalent to a logic of the network structure, but the work is too cumbersome static routing configuration, or to facilitate dynamic

Interface down. Static Routing will disappear from the routing table.

Thank you!

To your router, the static route will be there, no matter the physical interface up or down. It will not disappear.

Upstairs, not bars.
Runing-config Lane in the static routing configuration you will not disappear naturally. But in routing concerned. If the adapter down to the next dive. Routing will disappear. Otherwise, it will be impossible to achieve the floating routing is not a bargain


 Privacy Policy  Copyright © 1999-2000 LSLNET.COM. All rights reserved. Blue Forest website owners. E-mail : Webmaster@lslnet.com