Try-catch why not play a role? (Programming) [code]#include "Stdio.h>; Int main (int argc, char *argv[]) { Try ( Int b = 0 Int c; C = 9/b; ) Catch (. . . ) ( Printf ( "I 've got you!\n");     } Return 0 }[/code] Compiler [code]g++ -o Try-catch try-catch.cpp g -Wall -fexceptions[/code] Operation. /try-catch, With the result [color=red]Floating Point exception[/color] Rather than [color=green]I 'Ve got you![/color] Which brothers to give pointers? Try-catch why not play a role? (Programming) This is C + +, not Java, anything you must do by yourself. that is established by the exceptional run-time yourself detecter must not just the OS which maintains the run-time enviroment. You abuse the "try-catch" statement. and should find some textbooks to clarify the concepts of Java you keep in mind once. Try-catch why not play a role? (Programming) The code is landlord cattle. Let me put it this way a descendant understood. Try-catch why not play a role? (Programming) If you are interested, I could write an unusual category, SIGFPE catch, and then threw out floating unusual, and it will be your reality. Try-catch why not play a role? (Programming) Ah, the VC were misled! VC can be used try to catch the runtime error. So Oujiu always think that this is the C + + standard. : Cry : BTW : Actually, I have been Cer not JAVAer. C + + is not used more. Not how to read a complete book on C + +. Try-catch why not play a role? (Programming) My God 9/0 cruel [ Closed window ]