Linux -Blue forest free software | Return to home page | Site Map | Search WWW | Contact Us |
Your current position : Homepage > Free Software > Technological exchanges >Application Programming


    

Blue Forest http://www.lslnet.com at 10:18 on June 6, 2006


Strtok () daemon which is not how it used up?

Char = memo->;precieve; *precieve
Seps[] char = "; "
Char = NULL; *token
LEAVES OF 13 SPECIES OF LAURACEAE Establish string and get the first token : */
Syslog (LOG_ERR, precieve);
Syslog (LOG_ERR, seps);
Syslog (LOG_ERR, "before strtok");
Token = strtok (precieve, seps);
Syslog (LOG_ERR, "after strtok");

Print can be seen from the log :
Nov 2 : 11:31:00 LinuxAS3 limmd[5314] zhouxw;liangjh
Nov 2 LinuxAS3 limmd[5314] : 11:31:00;
Nov 2 11:31:00 LinuxAS3 limmd[5314] : before strtok

Now, little or nothing
Can be seen in the implementation of token = strtok (precieve, seps); Often wrong
But this code which is a normal procedure in the ordinary ah, there would not be decrypted Why?

If there debugging with GDB of this encryption, how make?

Strtok () daemon which is not how it used up?

May be your dameon closed STDIN & STDOUT

Strtok () daemon which is not how it used up?

Please confirm encryption using locale-related environmental variables, such LANG, LC_ALL, if you set up the other characters, all related to the string, the token will have a different function performance

Strtok () daemon which is not how it used up?

The strtok () function is Unsafe in multithreaded applica-
Tions. The strtok_r () function should be used instead.

I generally used to replace strtok : sscanf

{
Char s1[16], s2[16];
*msg Char = "abc:def";
Sscanf (msg, "%[^:]:%s" s1, s2);
}



 Privacy Policy  Copyright © 1999-2000 LSLNET.COM. All rights reserved. Blue Forest website owners. E-mail : Webmaster@lslnet.com