Linux -Blue forest free software | Return to home page | Site Map | Search WWW | Contact Us |
Your current position : Homepage > Free Software > Technological exchanges >System Management


    

Blue Forest http://www.lslnet.com at 3:18 p.m. on August 18, 2006


The basic concept of package management

I would just like to remind :
They use a system of co-management with personal systems, and consider ways are very different.

Before, I had some initial steps in this version, to learn the basic concepts of management package.
If the proposed study to old friends, we might have to think about the points which tarball installation deficiencies.
For example :
* Packages between libraries and how to protect and guarantee the dependence?
* The maintenance and inquiry / test packages of information? (What version? Where is the equipment? What changed? What impact? Etc.)
* In many cases the management to maintain uniform standards on how? (Care to take over first place himself into the person of your thinking. )

Then, think about how to solve this problem.
* Wrote a detailed written diary?
* Write log file format?
* Database management?

If you think that the database is good, then :
* Developed?
* Use others to write?

If someone else's, then what can?
* Dpkg?
* RPM?
* Others?

If you choose RPM, then the best way to find out what RPM DB can help us protect the information? How inquiries? 之 packages on how to ensure the unity and coordination with?
RPM spec best understand how the binary rpm and rpm db?

Finally, the system has once again look into the RPM db, how to make good use of it?
Also, if the next time you mix the tarball, and give up all the advantages rpm db, it will lead to what results?
* Packages to the integrity of the information will no longer?
* Packages dependence have not been tampered with?
* Introduction The purpose rpm db lost meaning?
* That it does db to manage Any different? (I recall thinking ahead tarball 之 you have? )

Rpm db for you if you think there is no significance, or that is the limit.
It's really no different to me thinking ahead.
If you agree rpm db (or other package management tools) significance.
Further down the tarball think convenience, whether through their own efforts, so that it can also be used rpm db? (Tips : RPM spec)

If you have already started to build their rpm and the.
Finally, please think :
You build the binary rpm, there will be others in the system run smoothly? Have thought of the differences in each other environment?
Then the other way round :
If you use the others build the RPM, it must be run smoothly in their system? (This is where the problems encountered landlord!)

The basic concept of package management

Thank you withheld increase precision!

Originally I would find discussed in the article titled postings.
Unfortunately, the full text search function can not use the time not to be (side could not find Google).

Which India as a friend? Help to find?
Otherwise, and so good at what I found.

The basic concept of package management

I have not found a read_article_english.cfm things to you. However, I do not understand.
Http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/more_control_and_pkg_man.txt

The basic concept of package management

Take advantage of the evening, a search can be used to find a senior :
Http://www.lslnet.com/linux/#forum/viewtopic.php?t=461826

The basic concept of package management

Debian dpkg and the Arch of pkg whether similar? ?
Arch dependent on the relationship between rpm pkg feeling a lot less!
Debian's dpkg package management never used!

The basic concept of package management

In fact, what the best package management, which not is not the most important. The key is to understand the original purpose of creating package management, which in many different Linux distribution, each will say their good package management. . . Gentoo said their ebuild, and RH RH distribution or type your own RPM, and some even say that tarball good. . . I think if we can really understand the concept of a particular distribution, management will use whatever package is very good. Tarball me, I have to use RPM, especially in the package management system using RPM done, if not RPM, SRPM find themselves to rebuild, without Car, a similar find. Spec documents, their editors, Then you want translated into the RPM and SRPM packages. If the other debian is a similar approach. . .

The basic concept of package management

Very landlord said yes.
I was a Linux beginners installed rh9, some through rpm management software, some software installed by source, the relationship between chaos caused libraries now have a loss.



 Privacy Policy  Copyright © 1999-2000 LSLNET.COM. All rights reserved. Blue Forest website owners. E-mail : Webmaster@lslnet.com