WIN FreeBSD performance parameters vary greatly with the method of calculation? My machine, quickly descended win2003, switched after Available memory of some 150,000 (my memory 256M) around 80M PF Usage of around 80,000 to around Cache System, CPU utilization rate of 0%. FreeBSD5.4 However, after entering the KDE look System Monitor, the use of memory is 230M even about some of the exchange rate to 0, CPU utilization rate stabilized at 25%, but Lane opened in the KDE terminal. importation of the data obtained with the System Monitor top there a big difference, may I ask is how these differences matter? Be able to explain in detail the reasons for these differences? Very grateful! ! WIN FreeBSD performance parameters vary greatly with the method of calculation? Generally, Linux and BSD which is to maximize the use of your Hard disk, how much memory it can use the number to avoid wastage of resources. ! WIN FreeBSD performance parameters vary greatly with the method of calculation? [quote][i] Note from the original "littleboywj" [/i] released : Generally, Linux and BSD which is to maximize the use of your Hard disk, how much memory it can use the number to avoid wastage of resources. ! [/quote] Not is not mrgreen : : WIN FreeBSD performance parameters vary greatly with the method of calculation? [quote][i] Note from the original "Kim Sum of transparency"] command to take the plane to say : [/i] mrgreen:[/quote play here : White is also used to use : lol : WIN FreeBSD performance parameters vary greatly with the method of calculation? [quote][i] Note from the original "Hami" [/i] released : Lol:[/quote] is spent using them : Halo : em06 : WIN FreeBSD performance parameters vary greatly with the method of calculation? [quote][i] Note from the original "Hami" [/i] released : Lol:[/quote] is spent using them : What started singing a song with regard? Cpu usage difference between the outrageous, freebsd is also off 1%, and almost win. [ Closed window ]