Linux -Blue forest free software | Return to home page | Site Map | Search WWW | Contact Us |
Your current position : Homepage > Free Software > Technological exchanges >Network Communication


    

Blue Forest http://www.lslnet.com at 13:28 on July 26, 2006

3550vlan communications anecdote


A division of VLAN2 and VLAN3 3550, and marks advection, PC3 corresponding VLAN, IP ROUTING in no time, can PING通 VLAN3 advection of the IP adapter, but the PING nowhere VLAN3 PC3; Similarly, in turn, The adapter can be VLAN2 IP links PC3 PING, PING not VLAN2 the advection. Finally, I employ IP ROUTING, the advection can PING通 PC3.
My questions : Why not ROUTINTG IP, IP advection can VLAN3 PING, PING not PC3
(VLAN3 and one of the PC3, and PC3 : VLAN3 IP Gateway is also filled.
We talk about a lot of hope. Thank you.

Direct networking, not routing. Host consider whether there is any problem.

Vlan interface, it can ping通 address, in 3550 because it is directly above the three-tier logical port, and played okay not Routing

Of this.

Initially issued by smlq
Vlan interface, it can ping通 address, in 3550 because it is directly above the three-tier logical port, and played okay not Routing
That can be explained, why PING通 VLAN IP adapter, and at one of the PC is not clear and is a three-tier IP VLAN adapter, the PC is not a three-tier IP? What are the reasons to do so. Trouble in detail, from the beginning, KAN.

Smlq has made it clear among


 Privacy Policy  Copyright © 1999-2000 LSLNET.COM. All rights reserved. Blue Forest website owners. E-mail : Webmaster@lslnet.com